Cumulative Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and School Outcomes During Adolescence: A Scoping Review.
Sarah A Stoddard, Chelsea R Moore, Carri S Polick and 1 others
PMID 42576338WHAT IT FOUND
In 24 US studies, 22 found cumulative adverse childhood experiences linked with poorer adolescent school engagement, attendance, grades, suspension and dropout.
This is association evidence, not proof that any intervention improves these outcomes.
Key findings
0122 of the 24 included studies found a significant association between cumulative adverse childhood experiences and poorer school outcomes.
02Each additional adverse childhood experience type was associated with 25% lower odds of high school graduation in one national longitudinal study.
03Behavioral problems and decreased academic performance partially mediated the association between adverse childhood experiences and high school dropout in three studies.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a scoping review aimed at broadly assessing the state of the literature and identifying knowledge gaps, not a study that tests whether interventions improve outcomes. Most included studies were cross-sectional and secondary data analyses, so the evidence is mostly associations rather than tested effects. Adverse childhood experience measurement varied widely; a score with only maltreatment and household dysfunction is not directly comparable to one adding poverty, discrimination and neighborhood violence. The review included only US studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals after 1995 and excluded gray literature and non-English publications, so it may not apply to other settings. Some studies relied on parent or youth reports of sensitive experiences, so social desirability and reporting bias are possible.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. Funding came from a University of Michigan School of Nursing gift and grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Nursing Research.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that any intervention improves adolescent school outcomes. The review reports associations, many from cross-sectional studies, and it did not test treatment effects.