RNOtherNursing research2025

Creating a Community of Safety in Black Maternal Health Research.

Alexis Dunn Amore, Abby J Britt, Renee Byfield and 8 others

PMID 40680283

WHAT IT FOUND

Black community members guiding a maternal health study said being listened to, shaping consent language, and helping create plain-language reports for participants made research feel safer.

This describes a partnership process, not tested patient care.

Key findings

01The community board helped edit consent forms and language about genetic testing so participants knew how their data would be protected and shared.

02Each participant received an Individual Participant Report of questionnaire scores, body composition, and medical record measures, with plain-language explanations drafted with board input.

03Board feedback produced four themes: making the study better, learning about research, voice for the community, and building trust; members said they felt listened to.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The paper describes one community-academic partnership at one birth center, so it may not fit other studies or communities. It reports CAP members' experiences, not patient outcomes, so it cannot show that the board improved maternal or neonatal health. Only 5 CAP members completed the evaluation, and feedback was not collected frequently enough to track changes over time. The CAP had 8 community members and 3 research team members, and one member left after 1 year, so the group was small and changed.

Declared interests

The study was funded by a National Institutes of Health R01 grant. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the positive board feedback as proof that this model improves maternal health outcomes. The paper reports a research partnership process, not tested patient care, and only 5 board members completed the evaluation.

Read it on PubMed →