PTCohortInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026

Contralateral Trunk Tilt in High School Baseball Pitchers: Comparison and Relationship with Trunk Rotational Mobility, Compensatory Lateral Flexion, and Performance.

Hiromu Tanaka, Yoshinori Kagaya

PMID 42549334

WHAT IT FOUND

Trunk rotation and the sideways lean pitchers show on testing did not differ between those with high and low contralateral trunk tilt, and neither predicted that tilt.

More trunk tilt went with faster pitches, but not more elbow torque. Only 19 pitchers took part.

Key findings

01Pitchers who leaned further to the non-throwing side did not differ from those who leaned less in trunk rotation measured in either the elbow-to-knee (lumbar-locked) or hand-to-knee position, or in the extra sideways bending of the trunk they used during rotation. For example, elbow-to-knee rotation on the dominant side averaged 62.8° ± 11.5° in the high tilt group and 64.5° ± 11.2° in the low tilt group (p = 0.745).

02Trunk rotation in both test positions, hip internal rotation, age, height, weight and years of pitching experience showed no significant relationship with how far a pitcher leaned at maximal shoulder external rotation.

03Leaning further at maximal shoulder external rotation went with faster pitches (r = 0.47, p = 0.004) but not with greater elbow valgus torque (r = 0.02, p = 0.935), while faster ball velocity itself was strongly related to greater elbow valgus torque (r = 0.69, p < 0.001).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study is underpowered by the authors' own standard: 19 pitchers were analysed where their power calculation called for 42, so a real relationship could have been missed. Every participant came from a single high school team recruited by convenience, so the results may not hold for other pitchers. Trunk rotation was measured in static quadruped positions on land, not during the pitch itself, so it is unconfirmed that those positions reflect what the trunk does while throwing. Pitchers threw from flat ground rather than a mound, which the authors note can change trunk mechanics. Right- and left-handed pitchers were pooled, and the direction of rotation can change how trunk rotation couples with sideways bending. Tilt was measured from the trunk as a single line, so the separate contributions of the thoracic spine, lumbar spine and pelvis could not be told apart. Measurements were taken at one point in time, so nothing here shows that one factor causes another. This group was mostly mobile, with only two of 19 pitchers below 50° of elbow-to-knee rotation, so a link between restricted mobility and excessive tilt may simply not have been testable here.

Declared interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest. No funding source is reported in the article text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the lack of a relationship as proof that trunk rotation and the extra sideways lean are unrelated to how far a pitcher leans during throwing. The authors call their own study critically underpowered: 19 pitchers against the 42 their power calculation required, so a real relationship could have been missed and their non-significant findings do not rule one out.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →