Concussion Classification in a Multicenter Patient Cohort: The Updated ACRM Diagnostic Criteria and Concordance With Physician Impression of Injury.
Andrew B Dodd, Noah D Silverberg, Keith Owen Yeates and 7 others
PMID 41065401WHAT IT FOUND
Applying the 2023 ACRM criteria to 1447 patients found 96.9% had definite or suspected mild TBI, versus 69.7% diagnosed by physician impression.
Most missed cases involved patients with lower symptom severity, suggesting clinical judgment may underdiagnose concussion when symptoms are less obvious.
Key findings
0196.9% of patients presenting to concussion clinics met criteria for definite or suspected mild TBI under the 2023 ACRM guidelines.
02Physician impression agreed with the ACRM categorization in 78.1% of cases, with underdiagnosis (18.4%) being more common than overdiagnosis (3.5%).
03Underdiagnosis by physicians was associated with lower patient-reported symptom severity, whereas ACRM criteria endorsed more often when symptoms were more severe.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The same physician provided both the general impression and the ACRM categorization, which may have led to contamination of the responses, although the final ACRM determination was withheld until after data collection. The study was conducted in specialty concussion clinics, so the high rate of positive diagnoses (96.9%) may not generalize to primary care or emergency department settings. Neuroimaging was not routinely used to determine the diagnostic category due to EMR limitations, and was only acquired in 35.8% of participants. Patients were assessed at a median of 23 days post-injury, which is outside the acute window (within 72 hours) where some criteria are most sensitive, potentially affecting the endorsement of certain clinical signs. The study relied on self-report for symptoms and mechanism, which can be influenced by recall bias and patient expectations.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the ACRM criteria are more accurate than physician impression; the study shows they classify more patients as having mTBI, but does not prove these classifications are correct. The high rate of 'definite' diagnosis (85.6%) reflects the nature of a specialty concussion clinic population, not the general head-injury population.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →