PTOTRCTJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Comparison of Body Weight Support-Assisted Balance and Gait Training With or Without Balance Perturbations in Poststroke Rehabilitation: Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pete Grevelding, Amanda Meyer, John Corbett and 5 others

PMID 41359867

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding eight balance perturbations to body-weight supported gait training did not improve balance, confidence, or walking speed more than standard training alone in poststroke inpatients.

Both groups improved similarly. The added perturbation module offers no functional advantage over standard care in this setting.

Key findings

01The primary outcome (Berg Balance Scale) showed no significant difference between the perturbation group and the control group.

02Secondary outcomes for balance confidence and gait speed also showed no significant intervention effects.

03Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in balance, confidence, and gait speed from admission to discharge, regardless of treatment assignment.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was conducted in an inpatient setting where participants were also receiving standard multidisciplinary therapy, so improvements may reflect natural recovery or standard care rather than the specific intervention. The Berg Balance Scale may have had ceiling effects, limiting the ability to detect differences in patients with higher baseline function. Some participants completed only the minimum two sessions due to short lengths of stay, which may have been an insufficient dose to show effects. Clinicians and participants were not blinded to the treatment assignment, which could introduce bias. There was variability in treatment strategies across the four sites, including one site using a high-intensity gait training program not used elsewhere.

Declared interests

The work was funded internally by the participating sites. Two authors (KR and AM) are secondarily employed by Aretech LLC, the manufacturer of the device used in the study. The study design and analysis had no input from the manufacturer.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that balance perturbation training is ineffective in general. This study only tested a specific low-dose protocol (eight perturbations per session) in an inpatient setting alongside standard care. The null result may reflect insufficient dose or the sensitivity of the outcome measures rather than the lack of efficacy of perturbation training itself.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →