Clustering trunk movements of children and adolescents with neurological gait disorders undergoing robot-assisted gait therapy: the functional ability determines if actuated pelvis movements are clinically useful.
Florian van Dellen, Tabea Aurich-Schuler, Nikolas Hesse and 1 others
PMID 37270537WHAT IT FOUND
Children and adolescents with neurological gait disorders showed three trunk movement patterns during Lokomat walking.
Some looked closer to typical walking, some looked less typical when actuated pelvis movement and released leg cuffs were enabled, and poorer trunk control tracked with unstable patterns.
Key findings
01Thirty-five out of 38 participants were analysed, and clustering placed them into groups of 9, 11, and 15 patients.
02The unstable cluster had negative thorax correlations with the reference treadmill pattern in both conditions and lower trunk control and daily walking scores than the other clusters.
03The partially stable cluster had moderate to strong thorax correlations with reference when the pelvis was fixed, but very weak to moderate correlations when actuated pelvis movement was enabled.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was cross-sectional, so it cannot show whether these movement patterns lead to long-term therapy improvement. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling and had a wide range of neurological gait disorders, which makes it difficult to identify the mechanisms behind their reactions. The actuated pelvis movement was set to 2 cm per side for everyone, and timing and magnitude were not individualized; this may have been too much for shorter patients. The harness and bodyweight support may have restricted trunk movement, although the overall range of motion between groups was comparable. The study did not assess leg kinematics or knee stability, which are also relevant when the FreeD module is used with released leg cuffs. Six participants could not perform the Timed Up and Go test, so it was not included in the statistical comparison. Two participants were excluded because of equipment malfunction and one because of poor compliance. Patients received minimal standardized instructions, so the results do not show what happens when therapists actively coach the movement. The reference pattern came from a different study of children walking on a treadmill, not from the same participants walking in the Lokomat. Two participants with poor trunk control were found in clusters other than unstable, suggesting that rigid muscle co-contraction may have made their movement patterns look more stable.
Declared interests
The work was supported by Schweizerische Stiftung für das Cerebral Gelähmte Kind, ACCENTUS Foundation, Switzerland, J and K Wonderland Foundation, Anna Müller Grocholski Stiftung, and Olga Mayenfisch Stiftung. No author conflicts of interest are stated in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that actuated pelvis movement alone improves therapy. It was tested together with released leg cuffs during a single Lokomat session in 35 participants, and the study did not follow patients over time to test long-term function.