OTSLPOtherJournal of autism and developmental disorders2024

Caregivers' Assessment of the Sensory Processing Patterns Exhibited by Children with Autism in the Gulf Region.

Rehab H Alsaedi, Suzanne Carrington, James J Watters

PMID 37171762

WHAT IT FOUND

Caregiver ratings showed children with mild or high-functioning autism had widespread sensory differences, especially touch, body position, movement, hearing and oral input.

Visual processing was typical. Older age was linked to slightly fewer symptoms.

Key findings

01Children with autism were rated by caregivers as having more atypical sensory processing than typically developing children across all Child Sensory Profile 2 areas except visual processing.

02The largest caregiver-rated differences between groups were in registration, touch, and social/emotional responses.

03Older age was associated with lower caregiver-rated scores for seeking, avoiding, sensitivity, auditory and movement processing.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Sensory processing was assessed only by caregiver report, so response bias is possible. The study included only children with mild or high-functioning autism, so it may not apply to children with more severe autism. The data were collected at one time point, so age effects do not prove change over time. The typically developing group was much smaller than the autism group. The paper did not test any treatment, so it cannot show that sensory supports help. The authors discuss that caregiver reports may be influenced by cultural expectations or parenting practices.

Declared interests

The only conflicts information given is that Taibah University and Queensland University of Technology funded the study.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these caregiver ratings as proof that a sensory treatment will work. The study describes group differences only, and it did not test treatment.

Read it on PubMed →