PTSystematic ReviewChild: care, health and development2025

'Bear Feels Sick': A Systematic Review of Picture Books About Physical Symptoms in Dutch Children's Literature.

Sterre van der Ziel, Elske Hogendoorn, Brian A Jorge and 3 others

PMID 40109168

WHAT IT FOUND

Dutch picture books for young children mostly show injuries and colds, and in 89% of the stories the child needed a remedy or medical care.

When accidents caused the symptoms, the child was always blamed.

Key findings

01The 55 books contained 155 physical symptoms between them; injuries were the most common (29%), then colds (21%) and feeling ill (14%).

02Symptoms rarely cleared up on their own: in 89% of the books a remedy was needed, most often a bandage or plaster (36%), rest or sleep (33%) or a medical intervention such as an operation (33%).

03Causes were left unstated in 41% of the books; where they were given, accidents (38%) and infections (18%) led, and in the accident stories the child was always the one to blame.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The search covered only the public library catalogue of Groningen province, so picture books available elsewhere in the Netherlands or in other countries may not have been included. Only books written in or translated into Dutch were included, and all were by Western authors, so books from other cultures may describe symptoms, causes and care quite differently. Deciding what moral each story carried was done by the researchers themselves and could reflect their own background, although every book was double coded and discussed. Only books where the main character is the one who is ill were included, so stories about a parent being ill were left out and may show a different picture. Informational books whose only purpose is to teach, such as books explaining what happens in a hospital, were excluded, even though children meet them in schools and daycare.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The work was funded by the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), the Dutch research council; the paper does not say that the funder had any role in choosing the books, coding them or writing the report.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as evidence that these books shape how children cope with being ill. The review only recorded what is printed on the page. No children were interviewed or followed, and no one tested whether reading a book changes what a child does when they feel unwell, so what children actually take from these stories is still unknown.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →