Auditory-Motor Function Pre- and Post-Therapy in Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders: A Case Series.
Defne Abur, Robert E Hillman, Cara E Stepp
PMID 37716889WHAT IT FOUND
After individualized voice therapy, all five patients who had unusual voice pitch feedback responses improved.
Pitch discrimination improved in some. Ten of eleven reported fewer voice problems, but no control group means therapy effects are uncertain.
Key findings
01All five speakers with atypical adaptive responses before therapy showed improvement after therapy.
02Average auditory discrimination thresholds were 40.1 cents pre-therapy and 38.5 cents post-therapy, but individual responses varied.
03Reflexive voice pitch responses did not show descriptive differences due to therapy.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only eleven speakers with hyperfunctional voice disorders. There was no control group, so changes over time cannot be separated from therapy. Therapy was individualized, and participants had between 4 and 16 weekly sessions across 1 to 5 months, so a specific therapy ingredient cannot be identified. Two participants with phonotraumatic lesions also had surgery before therapy. The group had mild voice severity on average, with CAPE-V overall severity of 17.1 mm before therapy, so patients with more severe voice disorders were not represented. The authors state that the eleven speakers may not be generalizable to the larger population of people with hyperfunctional voice disorders. Reflexive task data were incomplete for some participants because of time constraints. A single blinded voice-specializing speech-language pathologist rated the voice samples, and the stimuli did not include CAPE-V sentences. The study did not measure laryngeal movement, sensation, or breathing, so it cannot show whether changes were sensory or motor. The study did not follow participants after therapy, so the duration of any improvement is unknown.
Declared interests
One author has financial interests in InnoVoyce LLC, a company developing and commercializing technologies for voice disorders. The paper does not state who funded the study.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that voice therapy improves auditory-motor control in hyperfunctional voice disorders. Five speakers had atypical adaptive responses before therapy, and all five improved, but there was no control group, therapy was individualized, and two participants also had surgery.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →