Attitudes, Norms, and Control: What Is Shaping Fijian Children's Physical Activity and Screen Time Behaviours?
Sarah T Ryan, Anthony D Okely, Rebecca M Stanley and 2 others
PMID 41850862WHAT IT FOUND
Children were more likely to meet activity and screen guidelines when activity felt like something that would make them happier or help with schoolwork, and when caregivers felt able to set screen time rules.
Caregivers' beliefs about what others expected showed no link.
Key findings
01Caregivers who felt confident they could set screen time rules, who believed those rules worked, and who thought the rules made things easier were more likely to have children meeting the screen time guideline (odds ratios 1.507, 1.258 and 1.290).
02Children aged 5 to 8 who believed that 60 minutes of activity a day would make them happier (odds ratio 16.529) or help their schoolwork (odds ratio 5.464) were more likely to meet the activity guideline; both estimates came with very wide confidence intervals.
03Children in both age groups who said they had easy access to screens whenever they wanted were less likely to meet the screen time guideline (5 to 8 years odds ratio 0.469; 9 to 17 years odds ratio 0.510).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Activity and screen time were reported by caregivers rather than measured with a device, so the figures may be wrong through poor recall or because families gave the answers they thought were expected. It was an online survey, so families without reliable internet were less likely to take part: 77% of caregivers had a university degree against 23% nationally, and only 2% of responses came from the Eastern Division. For some analyses there were few children in the comparison group, which produced imprecise estimates and wide confidence intervals. The 16.529 figure for younger children's happiness belief is an example. The sample may not represent all demographic and geographic areas of Fiji, and 1015 caregivers took part but only 699 children completed their own section. Everyone answered once, at a single point in time, so the study shows which beliefs and behaviours go together but not which came first, and it cannot show that changing a belief would change the behaviour.
Declared interests
Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT 1176858). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the large odds ratios as evidence that changing what a child believes will change what they do. Every family was surveyed once, so the study cannot show which came first, and nothing in it tested a programme. The biggest number, that 5 to 8 year olds who thought activity would make them happier were 16.529 times more likely to meet the activity guideline, came with a confidence interval running from 1.227 to 222.665, which is very little certainty.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →