OTOtherJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2026

Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Adults With Severe or Moderate Intellectual Disability Using the Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors-Severe Intellectual Disability.

Annemieke Hoogstad, Samantha Bouwmeester, Liesbeth Mevissen and 1 others

PMID 41604227

WHAT IT FOUND

In 97 Dutch adults with severe or moderate intellectual disability, the caregiver interview DITS-SID showed good to excellent agreement between independent raters and linked with trauma and behaviour scores, but PTSD symptoms did not show a clear link to major traumatic events.

Key findings

01In 97 adults, 19 (20%) met PTSD classification by at least one informant, and 57 (59%) met the trauma exposure criterion.

02Independent raters showed good to excellent agreement for DITS-SID items, trauma exposure, and PTSD classification.

03DITS-SID PTSD symptom scores were strongly related to a trauma screener and related to problem behaviour scores, and adults meeting symptom criteria had higher daily interference, more atypical symptoms, and more reported traumatic and stressful events; however, symptom criteria were not significantly associated with having a criterion A event.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was limited to Dutch adults living in residential ID facilities, so the findings may not apply to children, community settings, or other cultures. No self-report data were collected, so the results depend on relatives and professional caregivers. Relatives and professional caregivers often disagreed on PTSD classification, even though overall outcomes did not significantly differ. Questionnaire data were substantially missing, although imputation and sensitivity analyses suggested the results were not meaningfully changed. Co-occurring conditions such as autism, epilepsy, Down syndrome, or visual impairment were not analysed as factors that might change trauma expression. The study evaluated an assessment interview, not a treatment, so it cannot show that any intervention helps PTSD in this population.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the 20% PTSD classification as a confirmed diagnosis. The interview showed good to excellent agreement between raters, but relatives and professional caregivers often disagreed, and meeting symptom criteria was not significantly associated with major traumatic events.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →