Assessment of knee flexion in young children with prosthetic knee components using dynamic time warping.
Mark D Geil, Zahra Safaeepour
PMID 37691910WHAT IT FOUND
No clear difference was found between prosthetic and typical knee curves in the main comparison.
Timing mismatch was greater in stance than swing, so comparing whole curves may reveal differences that peak flexion misses.
Key findings
01The timing mismatch measure did not differ significantly among the comparison groups, and the amplitude error measure did not show a significant main effect.
02The timing mismatch measure was significantly greater in stance than swing, and the lowest timing and amplitude error values were in bilateral comparisons within typically developing children.
03Typically developing children showed age-related reductions in timing and amplitude errors, but Early Knee children showed weak and inconsistent correlations with age.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only five Early Knee children and five typically developing children were analyzed, and only one pair per age group. The results cannot be generalized to all young children with limb loss. All Early Knee children had proximal femoral focal deficiency, so the sample may not represent other causes of limb loss. The comparison limb in a child with one prosthetic leg may not represent the motion that child would have had without limb loss. Age-matched controls introduce variability because neuromotor development changes rapidly at these ages. Stance and swing were analyzed separately, so the study does not show whether the method works well for the entire gait cycle. Individual prosthetic factors can distort curve comparisons. In one child, a high amplitude error was linked to a long residual limb and short prosthetic segment.
Declared interests
The original data collection was funded by The Gerber Foundation. This subsequent analysis was outside the scope of that grant and was not funded. No author conflicts of interest are reported.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that the Early Knee protocol produces more normal gait or reduces adaptations. The study was a small descriptive curve analysis with five prosthetic users and five controls, and it did not test clinical outcomes.