Assessing physical literacy with school-aged children in occupational therapy practice: An exploratory qualitative study.
Emma Clark, Amber Elliott, Alethea Jerebine and 1 others
PMID 40337537WHAT IT FOUND
Paediatric occupational therapists were unfamiliar with physical literacy, yet already assessed related concepts under different terms.
They said they valued the PL-C Quest for hearing children's own perspectives, but said clinical reasoning is needed and it may not suit every child.
Key findings
01The analysis produced four themes, including the value of hearing the child's voice.
02Eight occupational therapists were interviewed, and most had not heard of physical literacy.
03Six occupational therapists trialled the PL-C Quest with 12 children, and participants said it may not suit every child.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study interviewed eight occupational therapists, so it captures a small group's views rather than a pattern across practice. Participants were recruited from Victoria, Australia, so findings may not apply to therapists in other places. The time available for trialling the questionnaire was limited. Children were not interviewed and real-time assessments were not observed, so the findings reflect therapists' reports rather than direct observation. The PL-C Quest had not been tested in clinical contexts or with non-typically developing children.
Declared interests
Professor LB was involved in developing the PL-C Quest for the Australian Sports Commission. The Australian Sports Commission funded development of the Australian Physical Literacy Framework and the PL-C Quest. The authors declared no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of this article.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that the PL-C Quest improves outcomes or is validated for children with disabilities. It is a small qualitative study of therapists' views, and the questionnaire had not been tested in clinical contexts or with non-typically developing children.