An Investigation of Factors Affecting Bowel Movement Hygiene in Autistic Children.
Nadine Stacey, Beverley Turtle, Jean Daly-Lynn
Sensory over-reactivity to stool (sight, smell, touch) and motor difficulties in reaching and balance are the main barriers to independent bottom-wiping in autistic children.
Parents rate the stress at 5.88 out of 10, and only 13 of 74 had received professional help.
Key findings
1Sensory reactions to stool (sight, smell, touch) were strongly correlated with each other, and moderately correlated with fear of sitting on the toilet.
2Difficulty locating the bottom for wiping was moderately correlated with refusal to wipe, need for physical help, and preference for a nappy or pad.
3Parents rated the stress of their child's bottom-wiping at a mean of 5.88 out of 10; 68% scored 5 or above; only 13 of 74 reported their child had received professional help (7 from an occupational therapist, 3 from a nurse, 1 each from a health visitor, physiotherapist, and teacher).
Still to come
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Recruited via Facebook snowball sampling; the authors note the sample is not representative of the general population, and UK-based groups were more likely to allow advertising than non-UK groups. The survey did not ask whether the child had an intellectual disability or a dual diagnosis, which the authors acknowledge could significantly affect independence in toileting. The age range of 4 to 18 is very wide; the authors note that developmental differences between a 4-year-old and an 18-year-old were not examined separately. The survey did not include questions about auditory reactions to toileting (for example, the sound of a flushing toilet) or specifically about fear of the toilet itself, both of which the literature links to PBMH difficulties. Only 43 of 74 participants completed the open-ended qualitative question, so the themes are based on a subset. This is a single descriptive survey with a self-selected convenience sample; it identifies associations, not causes, and does not test any intervention.
Declared interests
No funding was received for this manuscript. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the qualitative theme about wet wipes as evidence that wet wipes are superior to toilet paper — it is parent report in an open-ended survey question, not a controlled comparison, and the authors themselves note the mechanism is unclear. More broadly, the correlations in this survey show that two things co-occur in this sample; they do not show that one causes the other, and the Facebook-recruited, self-selected sample of 74 parents cannot be generalised to all autistic children.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →