RNCohortJournal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses2017

Alcohol Use at the Time of Traumatic Brain Injury: Screening and Brief Intervention in a Community Hospital.

Madeline M Eyer, Colleen M Renier, Theo A Woehrle and 3 others

PMID 28272186

WHAT IT FOUND

Training and a screening protocol did not produce a clear increase in alcohol brief intervention rates after traumatic brain injury.

Outcome differences were likely driven by injury severity, not the intervention.

Key findings

01Brief interventions were given to 40.1% of patients with alcohol-related TBI after training, but the change was not statistically significant (p = .399).

02Of 1,386 patients seen for TBI, 423 (30.5%) had a positive BAC and 714 (51.5%) were not tested or suspected of alcohol use.

03Differences between patients with and without brief intervention were significant for TBI outcome, discharge disposition, length of stay, and postdischarge rehabilitation, but the authors state they were likely due to patient characteristics rather than the intervention.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a single community hospital, and institution-specific staffing and electronic health record alert design may not generalize to other trauma services. The analysis included only adults 18 years and older, so it says nothing about adolescents who may also drink alcohol and sustain TBI. Many TBI patients were not tested or suspected of alcohol use, so the alcohol-related TBI rate may be underestimated. The study did not test which components of the protocol or training mattered, and the authors recommend further research. Outcome differences between patients with and without brief intervention were not attributed to the intervention; the authors state they were likely due to patient characteristics. The later 95% screening figure was preliminary and came after additional workflow changes, not from the analyzed before-and-after period.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that brief intervention improved TBI outcomes or that training alone was effective. The study found no clear increase in brief intervention rates after training, and the authors state outcome differences were likely due to patient characteristics rather than the intervention.

Read it on PubMed →