Adaptive Functioning Across Contexts: A Comparison of Parent and Self-Reported Ratings in Autistic and Non-Autistic Youth.
Jo A Yon-Hernández, Ana-Maria Iosif, Apurv Srivastav and 1 others
PMID 40019621WHAT IT FOUND
Autistic teens and young adults rated their social adaptive skills higher than their parents did.
Parent and self-ratings disagreed across all areas, and autistic youths' self-ratings aligned with an independent social functioning rating.
Key findings
01In the autistic group, parents rated social adaptive functioning 7.65 points lower than participants rated themselves; no other parent-self differences reached significance.
02Parent and self ratings showed poor agreement across all adaptive functioning domains in both autistic and non-autistic groups, although agreement was somewhat higher in the autistic group.
03For autistic participants, parent and self adaptive ratings were significantly associated with an independent clinician-rated social functioning score; for non-autistic participants, neither was.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The analysis included 132 participants from a complete cohort of 176, using only those with both parent and self reports at the same time point, so it may not represent all youth in the cohort. Participants were 16 to 24 years old, had Full-Scale IQ scores of 70 or higher, and were selected from an original cohort that included only able and unmedicated participants, so findings do not extend to younger children, people with intellectual disability, or people taking medication. Autistic and non-autistic groups were matched for age but not fully for IQ, which may affect comparisons between the groups. The independent social functioning scale was adapted for autism and had not been fully validated in an autistic sample. The study did not collect the extensive developmental history, teacher assessments, and parent interviews that would be used for a comprehensive clinical diagnosis. ADOS-2 calibrated severity scores were used, but the authors note they have limitations as a measure of overall autism symptom severity.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that self-ratings are more accurate than parent ratings. Agreement was poor across all adaptive domains, and parent and self ratings were both significantly associated with an independent social functioning score in autistic participants.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →