OTSLPRCTJournal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP2016

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Sertraline in Young Children With Fragile X Syndrome.

Laura Greiss Hess, Sarah E Fitzpatrick, Danh V Nguyen and 9 others

PMID 27560971

WHAT IT FOUND

Low-dose sertraline did not improve expressive language or clinician-rated global improvement more than placebo in young children with fragile X.

Some secondary gains appeared in fine motor, visual reception, and combined developmental scores.

Key findings

01The three pre-specified primary outcomes were not significantly different between sertraline and placebo at six months.

02Significant improvements appeared in several secondary measures, including fine motor age-equivalent and raw scores, visual reception age-equivalent scores, Cognitive T score sum, combined MSEL age-equivalent scores, and SPM-P social participation raw scores.

03Adverse events were similar between sertraline and placebo, with 253 adverse events reported and no serious adverse events.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial was exploratory and smaller than planned: it required 60 participants but randomized 57, and 52 completed six months. Many secondary and post hoc analyses were performed, increasing the chance that a significant result is spurious. Children and caregivers were unblinded when they finished the study with their child, not at the end of the overall trial, which could bias parent and clinician ratings. Only nine girls were included, so possible differences between boys and girls could not be assessed. More than 93% of each group also received speech and language therapy and occupational therapy, and both groups had expected developmental gains over six months, so the contribution of sertraline cannot be separated from these therapies and normal development. Many standard scores were floored at the lowest score of 20, so the authors used post hoc age-equivalent scores, which changes the measure being reported. The positive ASD subgroup finding was post hoc, and the non-ASD subgroup was very small.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the significant fine motor, visual reception, combined MSEL, social participation, or ASD subgroup findings as proof that low-dose sertraline improves development in young children with fragile X. The three pre-specified primary outcomes were not significant, these other results were secondary or post hoc, and the children also received speech and language therapy and occupational therapy, so the contribution of sertraline cannot be separated.

Read it on PubMed →