SLPRCTEar and hearing2023

A Pragmatic Clinical Trial of Hearing Screening in Primary Care Clinics: Effect of Setting and Provider Encouragement.

Sherri L Smith, Howard W Francis, David L Witsell and 12 others

PMID 37599396

WHAT IT FOUND

Older adults completed hearing screening at 100% when offered in clinic, versus 22.7% and 26.8% at home.

Provider encouragement did not improve home completion, and fewer patients asked to screen at home completed diagnostic evaluation.

Key findings

01Hearing screening was completed by 100% of patients when offered in the clinic with provider encouragement, compared with 22.7% at home without encouragement and 26.8% at home with encouragement.

02Provider encouragement did not improve completion of at-home hearing screening.

03Out of 220 patients in each group, 26.8% in the clinic group completed a diagnostic evaluation, compared with 10.9% and 9.5% in the home groups.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Clinics were not randomized to protocols; each site chose the screening approach that fit its workflow, so differences between clinic and home groups may reflect site or patient selection rather than the protocol alone. The home-no-encouragement group differed demographically from the clinic-with-encouragement group, with more females and fewer Black or African American patients, and this was linked to one clinic's patient mix. The clinic group reached 100% completion, so some formal tests could not be estimated. Home screening required a quiet room and a landline phone, or a cell phone with ear buds, which may have been a barrier because close to 30% of older adults use only wireless phones. The study did not measure home ambient noise, health literacy, or technology use, and the instructions were written at an 8th-grade level. Provider encouragement was read from a script without training or coaching, so the content and delivery may not represent effective provider communication. Diagnostic evaluations were offered at no cost and arranged by a study coordinator, so real-world follow-up may be lower. Follow-up was short, with 60 days for screening and 120 days for diagnostic evaluation, and the study did not know whether patients obtained hearing aids or other treatment outside the trial. The study did not compare other screening methods, so another method might have performed differently at home.

Declared interests

The article lists NIH extramural research support. The conflict section reports that Dr. Francis serves on Surgical Advisory Boards for Advanced Bionics and Med-El, and no other author reported a conflict of interest outside funding for the study.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that provider encouragement improves hearing screening at home, or that home screening is a practical substitute for clinic-based screening. Provider encouragement did not improve home completion, and the 100% completion in the clinic group may reflect access to a quiet room and landline at the visit rather than encouragement alone.

Read it on PubMed →