SLPOtherResearch in developmental disabilities2019

Verb production by individuals with Down syndrome during narration.

Susan J Loveall, Marie Moore Channell, Leonard Abbeduto and 1 others

PMID 30500721

WHAT IT FOUND

During narration, participants with Down syndrome used verbs in fewer utterances than younger typically developing children selected to be close on nonverbal ability, not fewer than participants with other intellectual disability.

Verb variety was similar.

Key findings

01Verb density, the proportion of utterances containing at least one verb, was .75 for participants with Down syndrome and .86 for typically developing children, a significant difference.

02Verb diversity, the number of different verbs produced, did not differ significantly among groups.

03Verb TTR, the number of different verb roots divided by total different word roots, was .32 for Down syndrome and .36 for mixed-etiology intellectual disability, a significant difference.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The intellectual disability group had higher nonverbal cognitive ability than the Down syndrome and typically developing groups, so the groups were not fully matched on that variable. Verb coding counted any verb used in story-relevant speech, even if it was not grammatically or semantically correct, so it does not show accuracy. The relationship between verb production and sentence length was measured from the same narration task, and correlations do not show that verb problems cause syntax problems. The study included only English-speaking participants, so the pattern may not apply to other languages. The intellectual disability group included participants with fragile X syndrome, which may have influenced that comparison. This was the first study to compare verb production in Down syndrome with mixed-etiology intellectual disability, so replication is needed. The age ranges in the Down syndrome and intellectual disability groups were wide, although age was not correlated with the verb outcomes in the Down syndrome group.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that verb production is a Down syndrome-specific deficit relative to other intellectual disability. Verb density was not significantly different between the Down syndrome and mixed-etiology intellectual disability groups, and verb diversity was not different among groups.

Read it on PubMed →