SLPCohortAutism : the international journal of research and practice2025

Use of telemediated caregiver coaching to increase access to naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions within a statewide early intervention system.

Kathleen Simcoe, J Alacia Stainbrook, Kate T Chazin and 5 others

PMID 39381960

WHAT IT FOUND

Families who received telehealth caregiver coaching reported better child communication and language after services.

Caregivers and early intervention providers rated the coaching acceptable, but the study had no comparison group.

Key findings

01Caregivers reported improvements in child communication, symbolic behaviour and the number of words children could say and understand after the programme.

02Most caregivers and early intervention providers chose the highest satisfaction response on key service questions.

03Rural families had higher reported coaching fidelity than non-rural families, while child communication outcomes did not differ by location.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

There was no comparison group or randomisation, so the pre-post changes cannot show that the coaching caused the improvements; child maturation and post-diagnosis caregiver adjustment could explain them. Only families who completed at least one post-intervention measure or had fidelity data were analysed, and families who dropped out were more likely to have lower caregiver education or report Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, so results may not represent all families. Child outcomes relied on caregiver and consultant reports rather than direct observation of the child's behaviour. Satisfaction was measured only in families who completed three or more sessions, which may overstate acceptability. Group comparisons for BIPOC and Hispanic/Latino families used small samples, so differences in satisfaction and fidelity should be read cautiously.

Declared interests

Funding came from the Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities through the Tennessee Early Intervention System (Grant no. 70785), and REDCap was funded by UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH. The paper does not report additional author conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the improved caregiver-reported communication and language scores as proof that telehealth coaching caused them. The study had no comparison group or randomisation, so maturation and other factors could explain the changes.

Read it on PubMed →