Uneven terrain exacerbates the deficits of a passive prosthesis in the regulation of whole body angular momentum in individuals with a unilateral transtibial amputation.
Jenny A Kent, Kota Z Takahashi, Nicholas Stergiou
PMID 30717750WHAT IT FOUND
On uneven ground, ten people with transtibial amputation and passive prostheses had more variable body rotational momentum than ten controls.
The prosthetic side showed larger average rotational momentum than the sound side. This was a small lab study, not a treatment test.
Key findings
01Individuals with amputation had greater body rotational momentum when stepping onto the prosthetic limb and a greater range of that momentum on the prosthetic limb than on the sound limb.
02Uneven terrain made body rotational momentum more variable from step to step, and variability was higher on average in the amputation group than in controls.
03The average range of body rotational momentum did not differ significantly between flat and uneven terrain, and the predicted interaction was not significant.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 10 amputation and 10 control participants were analysed, so the findings may not apply to all prosthesis users. 11 amputation participants were recruited, and 1 was excluded because slow treadmill walking produced gait deviations. The uneven-terrain test was short, and participants had limited familiarization, so practice effects could have changed the results. Testing order was not randomized; all participants walked flat terrain before uneven terrain. The study used passive prosthetic feet only, so it does not tell us about powered or microprocessor feet. More amputation participants used handrails, and 3 changed hand position between trials, so sideways and twisting balance were not assessed. Foot-contact timing was estimated from motion capture, not foot switches or accelerometers, which could affect foot-contact values. The control group was shorter and lighter than the amputation group, although values were normalized to body mass, height and speed.
Declared interests
No author conflicts of interest are stated in the supplied text. Publication metadata lists NIH extramural and non-U.S. government research support.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that passive prostheses cause falls or that uneven-terrain training improves balance. The study measured a biomechanical rotational-momentum variable in 10 people with amputation and 10 controls during a short treadmill test, not fall outcomes or clinical recovery.