SLPQualitativeJournal of autism and developmental disorders2021

Understanding How Parents Make Meaning of Their Child's Behaviors During Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Longitudinal Qualitative Investigation.

Thomas I Mackie, Ana J Schaefer, Leah Ramella and 5 others

PMID 32328857

WHAT IT FOUND

Parents changed how they read their child's behavior during autism screening.

They noticed new signs, compared them with speech or other conditions, and searched for causes, moving toward or away from an autism explanation.

Key findings

01Parents described three linked processes during screening: becoming sensitized to behaviors as possible autism signs, differentiating those behaviors from speech or other developmental conditions, and using an autism frame to explain them.

02Written questionnaires and play-based observation helped parents notice behaviors in different ways: the questionnaire prompted direct evaluation of specific behaviors, while watching another person assess the child gave distance and new attention.

03Some parents did not adopt an autism explanation, attributing concerns to language issues or to the child's state during screening.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was small, with 22 parents in 19 families, and most respondents were mothers, so the themes may not represent all caregivers. It was conducted in three Early Intervention agencies in one Northeastern city with high proportions of racial/ethnic minority children and public insurance, so findings may not transfer to other settings. The study did not test whether screening improves diagnosis, retention, or child outcomes; it reported parents' experiences. Interview timing varied after each screening event, though none extended beyond 3 months, so recall differences are possible. Only parents were interviewed, not providers, so the paper cannot describe provider-side processes. The analysis did not determine whether screening misclassified children relative to true autism status.

Declared interests

Funding was provided by the National Institute of Mental Health and the Health Resources and Services Administration.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the screening protocol caused parents to accept an autism diagnosis or improved child outcomes. The study only described how parents' explanations changed over time, and it did not test effectiveness.

Read it on PubMed →