PTOTSystematic ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2018

Trends in robot-assisted and virtual reality-assisted neuromuscular therapy: a systematic review of health-related multiplayer games.

Kilian Baur, Alexandra Schättin, Eling D de Bruin and 3 others

PMID 30454009

WHAT IT FOUND

Thirteen studies suggest multiplayer robot or virtual reality games can make rehabilitation more enjoyable and may raise physical effort, but the evidence is too small and mixed to choose a mode or prove better recovery.

Key findings

01The review found only 13 studies, and their participants included students, adults and people with arm impairment.

02Studies that examined game experience reported positive effects of multiplayer modes, but some studies favoured single-player modes on performance or exertion.

03The authors concluded that the small number of studies and their differences prevent a clear answer about which multiplayer mode is best.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 13 studies were included, and they differed in players, games, devices, modes and outcomes, so the review could not give a clear answer. The search was limited to English and German publications, and the authors noted possible publication bias. The review mainly focused on neuromuscular therapy and health-related training, so it may not cover other relevant fields. The review was not registered in any database. The mean methodological quality score was 12.1 points out of 22, and the power item scored 0 points. The population was mixed, including students, healthy people, adolescents, adults and people with arm impairment, so findings may not apply to all rehabilitation patients. No follow-up studies were available for the included interventions, so long-term effects were not assessed. The studies did not consistently report how devices and games were selected or designed. The full variety of multiplayer modes was not covered.

Declared interests

The funding section names the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CH) and the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (CH). The supplied text gives no author conflict-of-interest declarations.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that a multiplayer mode alone improves rehabilitation. The games also involved different devices, partners, difficulty settings and outcomes, and the review could not separate their effects.

Read it on PubMed →