Trajectories of poverty and economic hardship among American families supporting a child with a neurodisability.
D W Rothwell, G Gariépy, F J Elgar and 1 others
PMID 31297920WHAT IT FOUND
After accounting for family background, having a child with a neurodisability was no longer linked to poverty patterns, but hardship remained higher.
These families were more likely to be poor and in economic hardship before birth and for 20 years after.
Key findings
01At the child's birth, families with a child with a neurodisability had 18.3% poverty compared with 11.5% among families without, and 30.4% economic hardship compared with 19.7%.
02From birth to age 20 years, families with a child with a neurodisability had an average 5.1% higher probability of poverty and 8.2% higher probability of economic hardship than other families.
03After adjustment for family and caregiver characteristics, having a child with a neurodisability was no longer significantly associated with poverty trajectory, but families remained 115% more likely to experience persistent hardship.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study is observational, so it cannot show that a child's neurodisability causes family poverty or hardship. Neurodisability was based on parent report and did not include conditions such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and severity or age at onset were not measured. The analysis assumed caregivers interviewed were financially responsible for the child, and the survey could not link children to the specific adults financially responsible. State-level social assistance and welfare policies were not controlled, and factors that affect both economic circumstances and neurodisability status may have been omitted. Poverty and hardship results differed: official poverty trajectories were not significantly associated after adjustment, while hardship was, so the choice of economic measure matters.
Declared interests
The PSID data collection was partly supported by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, and the research was supported by a grant from the Kids Brain Health Network of Canada. The supplied text does not report author conflict-of-interest declarations.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the higher poverty and hardship rates as proof that a child's neurodisability causes family poverty. Families who later had a child with a neurodisability were already more likely to be poor before birth, and after accounting for family background neurodisability was no longer linked to poverty trajectories.