SLPPilotPerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2023

Traditional and Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Treatment via Telepractice for Residual Speech Sound Disorders Affecting /ɹ/: Pilot study.

Laura C Ochs, Megan C Leece, Jonathan L Preston and 2 others

PMID 38764857

WHAT IT FOUND

Seven children with persistent /ɹ/ distortions completed 20 telepractice sessions combining visual-acoustic biofeedback and motor-based treatment.

Six showed clinically meaningful improvement, but the design cannot separate which component drove the gains.

Key findings

01Six of seven participants demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in /ɹ/ accuracy after the combined treatment package, with one showing no change and one marginal.

02The study measured the effect of the full treatment package, so it cannot determine the relative contribution of visual-acoustic biofeedback versus traditional motor-based treatment.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study combined two treatments without separating their effects, so it is unclear whether biofeedback, motor-based treatment, or both drove the improvement. Only seven participants were enrolled, limiting generalizability. Most participants had already received at least one year of traditional treatment for /ɹ/, so prior experience may have influenced response. Technical issues such as audio lag and internet interruptions occurred during the pandemic, which may have affected treatment delivery. The analysis focused on perceptual ratings of untreated words, not acoustic measures or session-by-session changes.

Declared interests

The authors declared no competing financial or non-financial interests.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that visual-acoustic biofeedback is more effective than traditional motor-based treatment for /ɹ/ distortions. The study delivered both treatments together and explicitly states it cannot separate their individual contributions.

Read it on PubMed →