SLPOtherCoDAS2024

The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults.

Lidiéli Dalla Costa, Ana Valéria de Almeida Vaucher, Maristela Julio Costa

PMID 38597550

WHAT IT FOUND

Repeating the Words-with-Noise test 14 to 28 days later in normal-hearing adults gave fairly consistent results, better for single-word lists.

Average differences were under 1 dB, so it may help assessment but not precise before-after comparisons.

Key findings

01Repeating the test gave good reliability for single-word lists and moderate reliability for two-word lists.

02Test and retest scores differed significantly, but the average difference was less than 1 dB.

03Most results were stable or improved at retest: 90% (81) for single-word lists and 80% (72) for two-word lists.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study tested only normal-hearing adults aged 19 to 44 with no hearing complaints, right-handedness, and at least primary education, so it says nothing about people with hearing loss, children, older adults, or people with neurological or cognitive disorders. The sample was convenience-based and 45 participants were analysed, slightly below the suggested more than 50 for test-retest reliability, although above the minimum 20 participants for the reliability analysis. Test and retest scores differed significantly, so small score changes should not be treated as real change. The study assessed reliability only, not whether the WWN test correctly identifies speech-in-noise difficulty in patients.

Declared interests

The authors reported no financial support and no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the good or moderate reliability as evidence that the WWN test identifies speech-in-noise difficulty in patients. It was tested only in normal-hearing adults, and retest scores differed significantly, although by less than 1 dB.

Read it on PubMed →