The use of evidence-based guidance to enable reliable and accurate measurements of the home environment.
Georgia Spiliotopoulou, Anita Atwal, Anne McIntyre
PMID 29386701WHAT IT FOUND
A measurement booklet helped occupational therapists and older people complete 90% of previously missing measurements, and 80.55% of those were within the accepted 50 mm margin.
Formal accuracy improvement was seen only for stair length, chair depth and chair width.
Key findings
01Using the guidance, participants completed 36 of 40 measurements they could not take without it (90%), and 29 of those 36 (80.55%) were within the 50 mm margin participants considered acceptable.
02When the groups were combined, repeated measurements taken with the guidance were statistically reliable for all but one item.
03The formal accuracy comparison between measurements without and with guidance showed improvement only for stair length, chair depth and chair width when both groups were combined.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was small and did not include physical therapists or speech-language pathologists. All health professionals in the sample were female, and only two occupational therapists had less than five years of experience. The design was within-group, with no separate control group. Many measurements could not be compared before and after guidance because some participants did not record measurements at baseline. The split-group reliability analyses had very few participants for some items, so non-significant results may reflect low power. The accuracy test found significant improvement only for stair length, chair depth and chair width, not for most items. The acceptable margin of error was based on 26 participants and was not linked to specific furniture measurements. The study did not record participants' impairments, so it is unclear how mobility, bending or vision problems affected measurements. Some guidance materials may have caused confusion, including the bath diagram, toilet seat pictures and chair height instructions. The study reported measurement reliability and accuracy, not device fit, safety or abandonment outcomes.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that this guidance has been shown to prevent equipment abandonment or improve patient safety. It tested measurement accuracy and reliability in a small group, and the formal accuracy tests were positive only for stair length, chair depth and chair width.