The Use and Perceived Usefulness of an Online Toolbox Targeted at Employers (MiLES Intervention) for Enhancing Successful Return to Work of Cancer Survivors.
M A Greidanus, A E de Rijk, M H W Frings-Dresen and 4 others
PMID 33090355WHAT IT FOUND
Employers of cancer survivors used a six-week online support tool mainly before work conversations.
Most found it useful, practical and reassuring when uncertain. This describes their perceptions, not proof it improved return to work.
Key findings
01Eighteen of the 22 employers who completed the questionnaire used the intervention at least once, averaging 2.4 visits and 26 minutes per visit.
02Users rated the intervention 7.6 out of 10 for usefulness, all would recommend it to a colleague, and none rated the intervention or any used part not useful.
03Some employers found the return-to-work phases too rigid for their situation and wanted additional specialized support for complex cases.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only 22 employers who completed the questionnaire and 20 who were interviewed, so it reflects a small group. Ten of the 41 employers who signed consent were excluded, and nine of the remaining 31 did not complete the questionnaire, so the final sample may not represent all employers. Non-profit and larger organizations were overrepresented, so perceptions may not apply to smaller or profit organizations. The authors did not measure characteristics or reasons for employers who dropped out before the questionnaire, so selection bias toward positive employers cannot be ruled out. The study measured self-reported use and perceived usefulness, not actual employer behaviour or return-to-work outcomes for cancer survivors.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the high usefulness ratings as evidence that the intervention improved employer behaviour or cancer survivors’ return to work. The study measured self-reported use and perceived usefulness only, and the authors state positive perspectives do not guarantee actual improved employer practices.