The role of oral and pharyngeal motor exercises in post-stroke recovery: A scoping review.
Reeman Marzouqah, Anna Huynh, Joyce L Chen and 2 others
PMID 36426582WHAT IT FOUND
Many swallowing, facial and sleep-breathing measures showed large group differences, but only 14.3% of speech measures did.
The review cannot show that exercises caused these differences.
Key findings
01Twenty-six randomized controlled trials were included, and most targeted swallowing function.
02Large group differences were reported for 59.5% of swallowing measures, 100% of facial expression measures, and 90% of sleep-breathing measures, but only 14.3% of speech measures.
03Twenty outcome measures assessed global body functions, while only nine assessed specific muscle or movement function and five assessed muscle structure.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The review did not assess risk of bias or study quality, so reported large differences may overestimate true effects. One reviewer screened titles and abstracts, so relevant trials may have been missed. Facial expression, speech and sleep-breathing evidence was limited, so the review may be more useful for dysphagia intervention design than for these functions. Many outcome measures assessed global function rather than the muscle or movement function targeted by exercise. This made it hard to link changes to the exercise. The effect sizes were not combined, so the review cannot establish whether oral and pharyngeal exercises were effective. Included trials were English-language studies in adults over 18 years with stroke, so results may not apply to children or non-English settings.
Declared interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. Funding was from the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Student Scholarship, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant, and the Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery Collaborative Grant.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the large group differences as proof that oral and pharyngeal exercises improve swallowing, speech, facial movement or sleep breathing. The review did not combine the trials, did not assess study quality, and the speech function outcomes did not show large differences.