The Presence of a Paretic Propulsion Reserve During Gait in Individuals Following Stroke.
Michael D Lewek, Cristina Raiti, Amanda Doty
PMID 30558525WHAT IT FOUND
Ten people with chronic hemiparesis after stroke increased paretic peak propulsion when resisting a treadmill pull.
At 10% body weight, peak propulsion rose 92%, and a 25% increase remained after pull removal. The increase was tied to trailing limb angle, not ankle plantarflexion moment.
Key findings
01Paretic peak propulsion increased during ascending 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10% body-weight restraining forces compared with baseline, and rose by an average of 92% at 10% body weight.
02After the restraining force was removed, paretic peak propulsion averaged 25% greater than the initial baseline condition, and this was not observed on the non-paretic side.
03The extra paretic peak propulsion was tied to a larger trailing limb angle, which explained 76% of the variance in increased peak propulsion at 10% body weight and 61% of the variance between initial and final 0% conditions; ankle plantarflexion moment change did not correlate.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 10 participants were tested, and they were fairly high-functioning: they had to walk at least 5 minutes on a treadmill with handrail support and 10 m overground without an assistive device, and ankle-foot orthosis users were excluded. Three of the 10 participants could not tolerate the 10% body weight force, and the actual average ascending forces were 2.3±0.4, 4.5±0.4, 7.0±0.4, and 9.1±0.3 % body weight for the 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10% target conditions. The study was a brief treadmill test, with about 20 seconds at each force level and only 20 seconds after force removal, so it is unknown whether the propulsion changes transfer to overground walking or last long enough to matter clinically. No rehabilitation intervention was tested, so the paper cannot show that a therapy improves gait speed, endurance, or daily function. The plantarflexion moment finding was complicated by one outlier, and it is not clear whether participants perceived the benefit.
Declared interests
The supplied text lists NIH extramural and non-U.S. government research support. It does not state a commercial sponsor, author conflicts, or that a sponsor designed or wrote the manuscript.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that a gait training programme increases paretic propulsion or improves walking. The study applied a brief restraining force to ten high-functioning walkers on a treadmill and did not test a rehabilitation intervention or measure overground function.