SLPSystematic ReviewInternational journal of language & communication disorders2026

The Predominant Focus Is Still on Teaching Children to Make Requests: A Systematic Review of AAC for Autistic Adults and Children.

Selena Mifsud, Donna Thomas, Ruth Bowron and 1 others

PMID 42059383

WHAT IT FOUND

Across 69 studies of AAC for autistic people, the research mostly teaches children to make simple requests.

Only five participants were adults. Quality of life, participation, and broader communication skills are barely measured.

Key findings

01The majority of the 69 included studies measured proximal outcomes such as requests and responses, while outcomes like quality of life, wellbeing, and participation were rarely the focus.

02Only five of the 421 participants across all studies were adults, and those studies focused solely on requests.

03The mean quality score across the 69 studies was 2 out of 5, and no study received the maximum score.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 5 of the 421 participants were adults, so the review tells you almost nothing about AAC for autistic adults. Most studies took place in clinics or isolated therapy rooms within schools, not in the homes, classrooms, or workplaces where communication actually happens. The mean quality score was 2 out of 5 and no study scored the maximum, so the underlying evidence base is weak. 57 of the 69 studies recruited a majority-male sample, and 33 were 100% male, so findings may not generalise to autistic women and girls. No autistic authors were on the research team, which the authors identify as a limitation for framing questions and interpreting findings. Non-English publications were excluded and only six databases were searched, so some relevant work may be missing.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest and report no funding.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as evidence that AAC does not work for broader communication goals. The finding is that those goals have not been studied. The 69 included studies mostly measured whether a child could say 'I want train' in a therapy room, not whether they could join a conversation, express a feeling, or use their device at home with a parent. The gap is in the research, not in the intervention.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →