The Influence of Maternal Pragmatics on the Language Skills of Children with Autism.
Yael S Stern, Nell Maltman, Megan Y Roberts
PMID 28514238WHAT IT FOUND
Mothers of children with autism had more conversation style problems in a parent interview than mothers of children with other language delays.
In both groups, more problems went with lower child language scores, but in different language areas.
Key findings
01Mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder had higher total scores for conversation style problems than mothers of children with non-ASD language delay.
02Higher maternal conversation style problem scores were linked with lower child expressive communication scores in the autism group and lower child auditory comprehension scores in the non-ASD language delay group.
03In the autism group, higher maternal conversation style problem scores were linked with lower use of expansions, but not responsiveness.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only 20 dyads, and the authors call it preliminary, so it cannot support broad conclusions about cause or treatment effects. The relationships were measured at baseline, and the study did not test whether changing maternal conversation style changes child language. Mothers were interviewed about sensitive topics such as diagnosis and developmental delay, which may have changed their conversational style. Pragmatic Rating Scale coders were not naive to child diagnostic status because the interview often led mothers to discuss diagnosis. The sample size was too small to examine which specific pragmatic violations were most relevant. Only responsiveness and expansions were coded, so other parent behaviors such as gesture were not considered. The authors also note that parent pragmatics and child language may influence each other over time.
Declared interests
The paper states that the dyads were part of a larger longitudinal study (R324A090181 from the Institute of Education Sciences). It does not give a separate conflict-of-interest declaration.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the findings as showing that a mother's conversation style causes child language difficulty or that coaching a mother's conversation style will improve child language. The study included 20 dyads, measured associations at baseline, and did not test an intervention.