The impact of communication on healthcare involvement for people living with motor neurone disease and their carers: A longitudinal qualitative study.
Camille Paynter, Susan Mathers, Heidi Gregory and 2 others
PMID 35860953WHAT IT FOUND
People with motor neurone disease and their carers described maintaining healthcare involvement as exhausting effort.
Communication breakdowns led to shorter answers, missed questions and reliance on carers to interpret needs. Clinicians should ask about communication preferences and allow extra time.
Key findings
01The effort of communicating reduced the amount and quality of information patients shared with clinicians, often leaving opinions and reasoning unexpressed.
02Carers became essential to healthcare engagement, managing appointments, setting up communication devices and acting as translators or proxy speakers, sometimes at the cost of their own employment and wellbeing.
03Participants perceived that intact communication was necessary for safe, person-centred care, with some completing advance care planning while their speech and cognition remained reliable.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Speech function changed less than expected in most participants, so the study could not fully capture how communication decline alters healthcare involvement over time. Cognitive screening was incomplete, and participants with frontotemporal dementia or impaired capacity to consent were excluded, so findings may not apply to those with more severe cognitive involvement. Healthcare professional perspectives were not collected; reports of clinician behaviour are only as experienced by patients and carers. All participants were English-speaking and managed at a specialist MND clinic, limiting transferability to non-specialist or non-English-speaking settings.
Declared interests
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these themes as evidence that communication strategies improve clinical outcomes. The study describes the lived experience of communication effort and the role of carers, but it did not test any intervention or measure healthcare results.