The Growth of Complex Syntax in School-Age African American Children Who Speak African American English.
Bryan K Murray, Katherine T Rhodes, Julie A Washington
PMID 38758672WHAT IT FOUND
School-age African American children who speak African American English showed slow growth in sentence combining by raw items, but not when compared with age norms.
Higher dialect density was linked to lower starting scores, but it did not slow growth.
Key findings
01In 513 school-age African American children, complex syntax raw scores grew by .15 points per month on average.
02When scaled syntax scores were compared with age norms, the monthly change was -0.01 and was not significant.
03Dialect density beyond 50% was linked to lower initial raw scores, but it did not significantly affect growth.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The children were followed from at least 8 years old, so the study cannot describe how dialect density and syntax develop before that age. Many children had only one time point: 268 of 513 contributed one measurement, and parent study retention was about 56%, with a refreshment sample of 360 children. The scaled score comparison used a national norming sample that was mostly White, about 78%, and not matched to the low-income urban sample. The dialect density measure was based on 15 items focused on phonological and morphological variation, not full sentence-level AAE syntax. The model could not estimate random growth effects, so individual differences in growth rates were not fully captured. The sample came from very low-income schools in one Southeastern U.S. urban district, so results may not apply to other African American English communities.
Declared interests
The authors report support from the National Institutes of Health, Grant 1R24HDO7545-01, awarded to Julie Washington.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read low scaled scores as proof of weaker syntax. The scores were compared with norms that did not match the children's language, and higher dialect density beyond 50% was linked to lower initial scores but not to slower growth.