Improved Singing Accuracy in Children With Bilateral Hearing Devices With More Musical Activities and Better Verbal Fluency.
Ritva Torppa, Li Xu, Lotta Keitilä and 2 others
PMID 41631738WHAT IT FOUND
Children with hearing devices sang as accurately as children with normal hearing.
The music course did not improve accuracy. More everyday music and better animal naming went with better pitch.
Key findings
01Children with bilateral hearing devices did not differ from children with normal hearing in singing pitch accuracy.
02The music intervention period did not improve singing pitch accuracy more than the waiting period.
03More informal musical activity and better animal naming were associated with better singing pitch accuracy.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 18 children with hearing loss were studied, and device subgroups were too small for separate analysis. The hearing-loss group mixed bilateral cochlear implants, bilateral hearing aids, and bimodal devices, so device-specific effects could not be tested. The intervention was only about 10 weeks with weekly 45-minute sessions, and some sessions were remote and some face-to-face. The two intervention-order groups differed in duration of device use, age at first device, and age at diagnosis. Missing singing samples occurred because children under 7 could not be forced to sing. The links with informal music and verbal fluency are correlational and may be bidirectional. Children had to know and sing Twinkle Twinkle Little Star, which may have selected children with better singing skills. The normal-hearing group had higher parental education than the hearing-loss group. The study did not measure pitch perception, so singing errors could not be separated from perception or motor-planning problems.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The paper names the funder as Signe ja Ane Gyllenbergin Säätiö.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the music intervention improves singing accuracy or that informal music causes better pitch. The primary comparison against normal-hearing children and the intervention versus waiting comparison were null, and the music and fluency links were correlational in a small study.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →