PTRCTJournal of physical therapy science2016

The effects of short foot exercises and arch support insoles on improvement in the medial longitudinal arch and dynamic balance of flexible flatfoot patients.

Eun-Kyung Kim, Jin Seop Kim

PMID 27942135

WHAT IT FOUND

In 14 young adults with flexible flatfoot, short foot exercises reduced navicular drop more than arch insoles worn while walking.

Both groups improved dynamic balance after five weeks of three-times-weekly sessions.

Key findings

01Short foot exercises reduced navicular drop height more than arch support insoles worn while walking after five weeks (SFE group 11.4 ± 1.6 mm to 7.7 ± 1.1 mm; ASI group 12.2 ± 1.8 mm to 10.5 ± 1.7 mm; between-group p<0.05).

02Both groups improved dynamic balance after five weeks (SFE group 74.3 ± 8.3% to 82.4 ± 7.4%; ASI group 72.4 ± 7.1% to 74.2 ± 7.2%; pre-post p<0.05).

03The change in navicular drop height in the group wearing insoles while walking was not significant within the group.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 14 university students were studied, all aged 21 to 26 with flexible flatfoot, so the findings may not apply to older adults, children, or people with painful or severe flatfoot. The groups had only seven participants each, and the paper does not report a sample size calculation, dropouts, or intention-to-treat analysis. The paper does not describe how randomisation was done, whether allocation was concealed, whether participants were blinded, or whether assessors were blinded. The insole group received arch insoles while walking, so the study cannot separate the effect of the insoles from the effect of walking. No untreated control group was included, and the paper does not report pain, function, gait, quality of life, adverse events, or long-term follow-up. The methods say five weeks, while the discussion says six weeks. The written results and Table 2 disagree about the Y-balance test: the text reports a between-group Y-balance difference, but the table marks only within-group significance. No primary outcome was explicitly named.

Declared interests

No funding or conflict of interest statement was included in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that short foot exercises are better than arch insoles for all patients with flatfoot. The study included only 14 young university students, the insole group also walked, and the paper did not report blinding, dropouts, or long-term function.

Read it on PubMed →