RNPilotGeriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)2023

The effects of nurse driven mobility intervention (NDMI) on activities of daily living, mobility, fear of falling, and balance performance in hospitalized older patients: A pilot study.

Yawen Pan, Ladda Thiamwong, Rui Xie

PMID 36566605

WHAT IT FOUND

Nurse-led daily mobilization help was feasible, but activities of daily living, mobility, and fear of falling did not show improvement; only balance performance changed.

Key findings

01Post-intervention data were collected from 13 of the 24 patients recruited.

02Balance performance changed after the intervention, while activities of daily living, mobility, and fear of falling did not show a significant difference.

03Patients walked independently or received ambulation assistance on 90% of hospital days.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 13 of 24 patients had post-intervention data because many were discharged before the interventionist could assess them or were not admitted long enough for at least three mobilization sessions. There was no comparison group, so changes cannot be separated from usual hospital care, normal recovery, or other therapies such as physical therapy, occupational therapy, or speech therapy. Patients were selected by convenience and had to be able to ambulate before admission, communicate in English, and have no marked cognitive impairment, so results may not apply to more frail, cognitively impaired, or non-English-speaking patients. The paper reports a decrease in the balance score but later describes it as improvement, so the meaning of the balance result is unclear. Many patients started with relatively high independence or mobility scores, leaving little room for improvement in activities of daily living or mobility scores. Short admission times limited the number of intervention sessions. Some patients could not stand still with eyes closed for the balance test, and the post-assessment method was changed to eyes open for consistency. Readmission and length of stay were not measured.

Declared interests

NIH extramural research support is listed in the publication types. No author conflict of interest statement is provided in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the balance change as proof that nurse-led mobilization improves balance. The study had no control group, only 13 patients had post-assessment data, and the paper reports a decrease in the balance score while later describing it as improvement.

Read it on PubMed →