RNRCTJournal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society

A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts.

Gregory A Panza, Lee Steere, Adam C Steinberg

PMID 35272303

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients using a force-activated separation device had fewer combined IV complications than standard care, but no individual complication type showed a separate reduction.

Nurses may replace separated connectors, and therapy delays were lower with the device.

Key findings

01The primary outcome, total combined dislodgement, infiltration, and phlebitis, was significantly lower with the device than standard care (P < .01).

02The device group had 46% fewer total mechanical complications requiring restart than standard care, but individual complications were not significantly different.

03After controlling for time enrolled, standard care had greater estimated total delay in therapy than the device (P = .001).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial was unblinded, and nurses recorded complications and event times. The significant primary result was a combined total; individual dislodgement, infiltration, and phlebitis were not significantly different. All catheters were placed by a dedicated vascular access team with a standard bundle, so results may not apply to units without that setup. The device manufacturer provided the device and an unrestricted grant. Cost savings are extrapolated from external estimates, not measured in the trial. Patients were adults expected to need IV therapy for at least 24 hours in selected inpatient units, so it may not apply to emergency or outpatient settings.

Declared interests

Lineus Medical provided the device and an unrestricted grant.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the reported 46% reduction as evidence that each complication type was reduced or that the projected cost savings are proven. The significant finding was for combined total complications, and the financial impact was estimated from external data.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
302 randomized (151 FASD, 151 SOC); 287 per-protocol (143 FASD, 144 SOC)
Certainty of evidence
Moderate

More in medical-surgical

Browse

Cite

Gregory A Panza, Lee Steere, Adam C Steinberg A New Force-Activated Separation Device for the Prevention of Peripheral Intravenous Restarts. Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society.

Read the original