The effects a respiration rehabilitation program on IADL, satisfaction with leisure, and quality of sleep of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Hye-Won Oh, Soo-Han Kim, Ko-Un Kim
PMID 28174451WHAT IT FOUND
Twenty patients with COPD completed a 12-week breathing rehabilitation program.
Scores for instrumental activities of daily living, leisure satisfaction, and sleep quality all improved after the intervention, though this was a small, uncontrolled study.
Key findings
01Total scores for instrumental activities of daily living increased significantly from 21.2 before the intervention to 27.0 after the intervention.
02Total scores for satisfaction with leisure increased significantly from 14.1 before the intervention to 15.9 after the intervention.
03Total scores for sleep quality decreased significantly from 8.5 before the intervention to 6.7 after the intervention, indicating improved sleep.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was a pre- and post-test design with no control group, so improvements cannot be definitively attributed to the intervention rather than natural variation or placebo effects. The sample size was small (n=20) and consisted only of outpatients with mild-to-moderate COPD, limiting generalizability. The study did not report long-term follow-up beyond the 12-week intervention period. The authors note that while sleep quality scores improved, they did not reach the threshold for 'good quality of sleep' (PSQI ≤ 5).
Declared interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaya University.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume this program is proven superior to standard care or other interventions. The study lacked a control group and had a small sample size, so the observed improvements could be due to factors other than the specific rehabilitation protocol.