PTOTCohortJournal of occupational rehabilitation2025

The Effectiveness of the Back At work After Surgery (BAAS) Work-Integrated Care Pathway on Return to Work for Patients Receiving Knee Arthroplasty: A Study of Three Comparative Cohorts in the Netherlands.

Daniël O Strijbos, Geert van der Sluis, Wim F C van Houtert and 8 others

PMID 40956371

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients receiving the BAAS work-integrated care pathway returned to work sooner than those receiving usual care.

The median time to first return to work was 27 days for BAAS versus 52 and 43 days for usual care groups. Full return to work also occurred earlier with BAAS.

Key findings

01The BAAS group had a median time to first return to work of 27 days, compared to 52 days for the Expect TO work cohort and 43 days for the ACTIVE cohort.

02For full return to work, the median time was 183 days for BAAS versus 210 days for the ACTIVE cohort.

03Secondary outcomes showed mixed results: recovery in sports/recreation and quality of life favored BAAS, but recovery in symptoms and activities of daily living favored care-as-usual.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was not a randomized controlled trial, so despite statistical adjustments, baseline differences between groups may have influenced outcomes. Return to work outcomes were self-reported, which introduces the possibility of reporting bias. The BAAS group had a higher proportion of patients with lower levels of education, which is typically associated with slower recovery and longer time to return to work; this may have underestimated the potential benefit of the intervention. Implementation fidelity varied between hospitals, with one site showing better outcomes, possibly due to more intensive involvement of the lead researcher. Secondary clinical outcomes were mixed, with some domains favoring usual care, suggesting the intervention primarily benefits participation rather than all aspects of physical recovery.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume this pathway improves all physical outcomes equally. While return to work was faster, some clinical measures like activities of daily living actually favored usual care, so the primary benefit is participation-focused rather than a universal improvement in physical function.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →