The effect of the information systems literacy of emergency health employees on their technology acceptance levels.
Aysegul Aydin, Etem Hizaler, Tülin Filik and 1 others
PMID 40567206WHAT IT FOUND
Emergency ambulance staff who rated their information-systems skills higher also rated the new digital record-keeping as easier and more useful to use.
Staff who had been trained on digital health records scored higher on both. This is a survey, so it shows association, not cause.
Key findings
01Employees who rated their information systems skills higher also rated the technology as more useful and easier to use, both relationships moderate and statistically significant.
02In the model the researchers tested, information systems literacy predicted perceived ease of use more strongly than perceived usefulness, and both effects were statistically significant.
03Staff who had received training in digital health records scored higher on information systems literacy and on perceived ease of use than staff who had not.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Everyone surveyed worked for ambulance and emergency health services in one Turkish city, so the numbers may not describe staff elsewhere or in other parts of the health service. Only 233 of the 600 employees in the population took part, and the survey was voluntary and online, so those who answered may differ from those who did not. Everything was self-reported in the same questionnaire at the same time, so the link between information systems literacy and technology acceptance may partly reflect people answering consistently rather than a real causal path. Because the survey was taken at one point in time, it cannot show that raising someone's information systems literacy would raise their acceptance of the technology. Almost everyone rated their skills and the usefulness of the technology near the top of the scale, which leaves little room to distinguish between people. The authors themselves state the main limitation is that the sample covers only Kayseri and only 112 Emergency Health Services.
Declared interests
The authors state that they received no financial support for the research, authorship or publication of the article, and that they have no potential conflicts of interest to declare. No company or sponsor was involved.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that training staff in digital records, or raising their computer skills, will make them accept new technology. It is a single questionnaire survey in one city, where the same people reported both their skills and their attitudes at the same moment, so a link of this kind cannot show which one causes the other.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →