PTRCTClinical rehabilitation2026

The effect of breathing exercises and mindset with or without cold exposure on mental and physical health in persons with a spinal cord injury-Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Sonja de Groot, Frank Wl Ettema, Max van der Bijll and 3 others

PMID 41810770

WHAT IT FOUND

Breathing and mindset exercises with cold showers did not improve mental health in people with spinal cord injury.

However, this combined approach improved inspiratory breathing capacity and lowered fasting glucose compared to usual care, while the breathing-only group showed no such physical benefits.

Key findings

01The primary outcome, mental health, showed no significant difference between the Wim Hof Method groups and usual care.

02Inspiratory lung function and fasting glucose improved significantly in the group that included cold exposure, but not in the group that did breathing exercises only.

03The intervention with cold exposure also reduced the perceived impact of pain on daily activities compared to usual care, although pain intensity itself did not change.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample size was small, particularly in the breathing-only group where many participants dropped out, reducing statistical power. Participants who dropped out declined posttreatment assessments, preventing a true intention-to-treat analysis for those individuals. The cold showers were home-based and averaged 14.6°C, which may be less standardized or intense than laboratory conditions. Multiple statistical comparisons were made without correction, increasing the risk that some significant findings occurred by chance. The study lacked long-term follow-up to determine if the physical benefits were sustained after the 7-week intervention ended.

Declared interests

The study was funded by specific foundations (Vaals Fonds, Stichting Wijnand Carnoy Fonds, and Stichting Sante Postma Fonds). The authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not recommend this intervention for mental health benefits based on this trial, as the primary outcome was null. The observed improvements in lung function and glucose were specific to the group that received cold exposure, suggesting the breathing exercises alone were insufficient to produce these physical changes.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →