RNRCTNursing in critical care2025

The effect of an open-heart surgery patient care protocol on post-sternotomy pain, anxiety and quality of care: A randomized controlled trial.

Necibe Dağcan Şahin, Gülşah Gürol Arslan

PMID 39411842

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients given a bundled nurse-delivered care protocol after open-heart surgery had lower pain and higher quality of care than routine ICU care.

Anxiety fell in both groups, and the paper does not show a clear anxiety advantage over routine care.

Key findings

01Pain scores were lower at all measurement times, and the protocol group used fewer analgesics (1.41 ± .80 vs 3.22 ± 1.79).

02State anxiety scores fell within both groups (experimental 39.28 to 28.28; control 58.03 to 44.12), but the supplied text does not report a between-group anxiety test.

03Perceived quality of care was higher in the protocol group on the 14-70 point questionnaire (66.50 ± 4.60 vs 44.03 ± 8.63).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The protocol was developed only for a cardiac surgical intensive care unit and tested there, so it may not apply to other units or patients. The study did not follow patients after transfer from intensive care to the clinic, so effects after ICU discharge are unknown. The time between surgery and extubation was not included, which may affect early pain and anxiety findings. The intervention was a bundle of many nursing actions, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The supplied text reports within-group anxiety decreases but does not report a between-group anxiety test, so the anxiety effect relative to routine care is not established. Pre-test anxiety means differed between groups, 39.28 in the protocol group and 58.03 in the control group, and the paper does not report a test of that baseline difference.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The supplied text does not name a funder.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that one nursing action caused the pain or anxiety reduction. The protocol bundled patient delivery, visits, tests, evaluation and diagnostic procedures, medication administration, pain management, treatment and clinical procedures, nursing interventions, psychosocial support, hydration and nutrition, activity and environmental safety, patient information, service transfer planning, and evaluation, and the study does not separate their effects. Do not read the anxiety result as proof of lower anxiety than routine care, because the supplied text reports anxiety decreases within both groups but no between-group anxiety test.

Read it on PubMed →