SLPOtherAutism : the international journal of research and practice2017

The diagnosis of autism and autism spectrum disorder in low- and middle-income countries: Experience from Jamaica.

Maureen Samms-Vaughan, Mohammad H Rahbar, Aisha S Dickerson and 9 others

PMID 28367671

WHAT IT FOUND

Jamaican children already classified as having autism by the CARS all matched ADOS, and most matched ADI-R and ADOS-2.

The study did not include children without autism or milder symptoms, so it cannot show the CARS is accurate for all diagnoses.

Key findings

01All 149 children classified as having autism by the CARS were also classified as having autism or autism spectrum by the ADOS; 146 of 149 were classified as having autism or autism spectrum by the ADOS-2, and 141 of 149 were classified as having autism by the ADI-R.

02Score relationships between total CARS scores and ADOS, ADOS-2, and ADI-R total scores were significant but moderate, with values of 0.34, 0.42, and 0.35, and the highest value was for ADOS-2.

03Among the ten children whose CARS autism classification did not agree with the ADI-R or ADOS-2, seven did not reach threshold in at least two ADI-R domains, two did not reach threshold for ADOS-2, and one did not reach threshold for both.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only children already assessed as having autism by the CARS, so it cannot show how the CARS performs in children without autism or with milder symptoms. Children with possible milder symptoms, including CARS scores of 25 to 29.5, were not included, and no non-ASD comparison group was available to determine specificity or concordance across instruments. The methods report CARS scores available for 143 children, but agreement results are reported for 149 children, so the exact CARS-score basis is unclear. The CARS was administered by a single highly experienced professional, so the findings may not apply to less experienced users. The psychologist administering ADOS and ADI-R was not blinded to the study, which can influence classification. The time between CARS and ADOS or ADI-R assessments averaged 17.4 months, with a range of 0 to 77 months, so intervening development or services could affect scores. The instruments were not fully culturally adapted; only language changes were made where needed, and culturally adapted instruments might have different norms or cut-off points. Participation was limited by refusals: 42.9% refused, mainly because of required blood samples, the 4-5 hour assessment time, and no incentive. The sample came from a university referral center clinical database, not a general population, so it may not represent all Jamaican children.

Declared interests

The supplied text does not include a funding statement or author conflict of interest declaration. The publication types list N.I.H. extramural research support.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the high agreement as proof that the CARS accurately diagnoses autism in all Jamaican children. The study compared only children already classified as having autism by the CARS, and it did not include children without autism or children with milder symptoms.

Read it on PubMed →