PTOtherClinical rehabilitation2016

The development and validation of a novel outcome measure to quantify mobility in the dysvascular lower extremity amputee: the amputee single item mobility measure.

Daniel C Norvell, Rhonda M Williams, Aaron P Turner and 1 others

PMID 27496697

WHAT IT FOUND

A one-question mobility measure tracked dysvascular amputees from surgery to 12 months.

It aligned with a standard mobility measure, prosthetic use, satisfaction, and amputation level, and improved over time, but six-week scores did not predict later mobility.

Key findings

01The AMPSIMM score correlated with the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 at 0.72 at six weeks, 0.81 at four months, and 0.86 at 12 months.

02Six-week AMPSIMM scores did not significantly predict 12-month Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 scores (r = 0.07; p = 0.56), while four-month scores did (r = 0.40; p = 0.004).

03AMPSIMM scores improved from six weeks to 12 months with a standardized response mean of 1.0, and at 12 months 2.4% achieved the minimum score and 6.1% achieved the maximum score.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used data from Veterans Administration patients with a first major lower extremity amputation due to diabetes or peripheral arterial disease, so it may not apply to people with other amputation causes or prior amputations. Only 2 of 113 participants were female, so the sample was almost entirely male. Follow-up analyses used fewer people than enrolled: 92 at six weeks, 90 at four months, and 82 at 12 months. Only 57% of eligible people participated, and some eligible people refused, died, or missed the recruitment window. Test-retest reliability was not assessed. The AMPSIMM is a single item and may be less precise than multi-item measures or tests such as the 2-minute walk test. It was not designed to provide detailed information about specific mobility interventions, such as public transport access or changing walking aids. Six-week scores did not predict 12-month mobility, so early scores should not be used for prediction.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The work was supported by the US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research and Development.

The easy way to misread this

Do not use the six-week AMPSIMM score to predict mobility at 12 months. The six-week association with later Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 scores was not statistically significant (r = 0.07; p = 0.56).

Read it on PubMed →