The Challenges in Conducting Economic Evaluations for Rehabilitation Technologies.
Brian Chun-Fai Chan
PMID 38174139WHAT IT FOUND
Rehabilitation technologies are hard to evaluate for cost because trials often cannot blind therapists and patients, recruit enough people, agree on treatment dose, and devices change quickly.
Key findings
01A review of rehabilitation economic evaluations included 129 publications and found no spinal cord injury studies.
02In physical therapy trials, only 8% blinded participants and 2.5% were double blinded.
03Therapists reported that lower limb exoskeletons have a steep learning curve, are technically demanding, and create scheduling barriers.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a narrative review, not a systematic review with a pre-specified search. It summarizes other reviews and does not report patient outcomes. It cannot show whether a specific rehabilitation technology is effective or cost-effective. It focuses on economic evaluation barriers, not clinical care.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that rehabilitation technologies are ineffective or not cost-effective. It describes barriers to producing economic evidence, not failed treatments.