SLPOtherJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2025

The Behaviour Support Plan Content Appraisal Tool (BSP-CAT): A New Tool for Assessing and Improving the Quality of Behavioural Support Plans.

Peter Baker, Nick Gore, Suzi Sapiets and 3 others

PMID 41277346

WHAT IT FOUND

The new Behaviour Support Plan Content Appraisal Tool shows moderate to good consistency when experienced staff score the same plan twice or when two staff score it together.

It is not yet validated, so use it only for supervision or self-audit by trained practitioners.

Key findings

01The tool was developed over five years specifically for auditing behaviour support plans for adults with intellectual disabilities in UK community settings.

02Test-retest reliability for the total score was strong, but inter-rater agreement between two practitioners scoring the same plan was only moderate.

03The authors recommend the tool be used only by individuals with appropriate professional experience and training in Positive Behaviour Support.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Validity was not formally assessed, so it is unknown whether the tool actually measures plan quality accurately. The final version of the tool was changed after the reliability data were collected, so the reported reliability applies to the earlier version. All participants had prior PBS experience, so the tool's consistency is unknown for less experienced users. Plans were chosen opportunistically from services that already had them, which may not represent typical practice. The study was conducted in UK community services, so applicability to other countries or settings is untested.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Funding was provided by the Sharland Foundation Developmental Disabilities Applied Behavioural Research and Impact Network, the University of Birmingham, and University College London.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the moderate inter-rater agreement as a minor technical detail. Two practitioners scoring the same plan disagreed moderately on the total score, so the tool is not yet reliable enough for formal performance management or research outcomes without further validation.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →