The autism symptom interview, school-age: A brief telephone interview to identify autism spectrum disorders in 5-to-12-year-old children.
Somer L Bishop, Marisela Huerta, Katherine Gotham and 6 others
PMID 27282463WHAT IT FOUND
A phone parent interview can flag school-age children at high risk for ASD, but it does not diagnose.
It identified many children with ASD yet also many without, so in-person assessment is still needed.
Key findings
01The verbal algorithm showed good agreement with clinical diagnosis, with AUC .80; at a cut-off of 38, sensitivity was .87 and specificity .62.
02For nonverbal children, the sample was too small to calculate overall diagnostic accuracy or recommend a cut-off.
03Test-retest scores were stable in 10 children, with ICC .96.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was an initial validation, not a final clinical test. The items and cut-off were chosen using the same sample, so they need replication in independent samples. The nonverbal sample was too small to establish accuracy or recommend a cut-off. Children with known genetic syndromes were excluded, so results may not apply to children with those conditions. The non-ASD group was mostly children with established non-ASD diagnoses, not children referred specifically for ASD concerns, so false positives in a clinic referral sample could differ. The interview did not have high enough specificity to identify ASD by itself, and scores overlapped between groups. The interview does not provide domain scores or severity, so it cannot describe the symptom profile.
Declared interests
Lord, Gotham, and Bishop receive royalties for ADOS, ADOS-2, and ADI-R; royalties from their own research or clinical activities are donated to charity. The supplied text does not state a funding source.
The easy way to misread this
Do not use the ASI alone to diagnose or rule out ASD. At the tested cut-off, it flagged many children without ASD, and the authors state it did not reach high enough specificity for isolated use. A direct observation assessment is still needed.