The Association Between Cognitive Performance and Speech-in-Noise Perception for Adult Listeners: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
Adam Dryden, Harriet A Allen, Helen Henshaw and 1 others
PMID 29237334WHAT IT FOUND
People who scored higher on tests of working memory, episodic memory, inhibitory control, or processing speed tended to understand speech in noise better across 25 studies of 1,026 unaided adults with normal to moderate hearing loss.
Key findings
01Across 25 studies and 1,026 listeners, cognitive performance and speech-in-noise perception had a pooled association of .31.
02Pooled associations for cognitive subdomains ranged from .18 to .39 and were significant except for crystallized intelligence.
03Working memory had a pooled association of .43 for sentences presented in more than two talker babble.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Most included studies did not justify sample size, so a study finding no association may not mean there is no association. The review combined studies that used different speech-in-noise tests and cognitive tests, so the pooled association may not apply to every clinical test. It could not separate hearing groups because studies included overlapping ranges from normal to mild or moderate loss. Crystallized intelligence showed no significant pooled association, and the studies gave very different results. Many cognitive domains, including alerting, orienting, and fluid intelligence, had too few studies to analyze. The review did not examine aided listening or hearing intervention, so it says little about hearing aid users. The speech-in-noise categories did not distinguish tests that changed noise level during the test from tests that kept it fixed, and they ignored response type, intelligibility level, and presentation mode. Many included studies did not report conflicts of interest, so commercial influence in the underlying evidence cannot be ruled out.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these associations as proof that cognitive ability causes difficulty with speech in noise. The included studies measured both at one time point, and many individual study results were not significant.