OTPilotOTJR : occupation, participation and health2023

Telehealth Lifestyle Redesign Occupational Therapy for Diabetes: Preliminary Effectiveness, Satisfaction, and Engagement.

Seth Mitchell, John Sideris, Jeanine Blanchard and 3 others

PMID 37165993

WHAT IT FOUND

Telehealth Lifestyle Redesign OT was followed by large improvements in occupational performance and diabetes management in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and satisfaction was high.

Without a control comparison, the improvements cannot be credited to the therapy alone.

Key findings

01Participants' ratings of their own occupational performance and satisfaction with it rose significantly between starting and finishing therapy (both p < .0001), but only 40 of the 70 people who completed the occupational performance measure at the start had scores at discharge.

02Scores on the diabetes management questionnaire improved on every subscale, from p = .017 to p < .0001, with a large proportion of participants missing discharge data.

03Satisfaction with telehealth was high: 91% were very satisfied with their overall treatment experience, 98% would use telehealth again, and 80% would recommend it; 65% rated telehealth a little or much better than in-person care.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only part of the trial sample is here. The telehealth trial is still running, and this analysis covers only participants who had finished the six-month therapy by August 2022. The outcomes were measured before and after therapy with no comparison group. These measures were not collected from the usual care arm, so the improvements could reflect time, attention, or regression to the mean rather than the therapy itself. Only 40 of the 70 people who started the occupational performance measure had scores at discharge. People who were doing better at the start were less likely to be measured again, which makes the average improvement look larger than it may be. Incomplete data entry while the trial is running also reduced the numbers available and the study's ability to detect differences.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health / National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (grant R01DK116719-01A1). The funder's role in designing or writing up the work is not described.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these improvements as proof that telehealth occupational therapy works. The measures were never collected from the people assigned to usual care, so nothing here rules out other explanations such as regression to the mean. Only 40 of the 70 people who started the occupational performance measure had scores at discharge, and those who dropped out had been scoring higher at the start.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →